1/Jack Daniel's Old No.7 at $55 and Buffalo Trace at $58 are both sitting at the bottom of their own recent range this week. Two everyday American whiskeys, a few dollars apart, quietly at their floor at the same time.
2/The engine files them as rough neighbours on flavour make-up, eighteenth on the list, though its value model is a touch cooler on the match at twentieth. Close-ish. Not twins.
3/Neither price is a membership deal doing the quiet work. Both are plain shelf tickets at the low end of their own recent runs, which is a timing thing more than a verdict.
4/So take it as a moment rather than a ruling: two honest bourbons both cheap this Thursday. The $55 Jack or the $58 Buffalo Trace for the everyday pour? (Both Dan Murphy's.)
2026-08-13-replay/compare-the-pair/jack-daniel-s-old-no-7-tennessee-whiskey-700ml-buffalo-trace-264648, grounded on vintage 2026-08-13.r, window as-of 2026-08-13.Compare the pair, automated light form. Two live tickets and each bottle's own-history position only; no CE 360 bands, no cross-read CEARP, no Welch t-test (the module does not produce them, pair_level null). This is not a divergence piece: the two engines broadly agree (VSM rank 18, CE rank 20, rank_diff -2). It qualifies on both bottles being at their own-history floor this week (quiet_discount). Both prices shelf basis, neither a member offer. Both 700mL.
{
"date": "2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"title": "Jack Daniel's and Buffalo Trace, both at their floor at once",
"angle": "compare-the-pair",
"position": "n/a",
"status": "draft",
"derives_from": "none — standalone; the automated cycle grounds this on the vintage build and live tickets, no long-form article backs it",
"grounded_on": "2026-08-13.r (CE/VSM ranks); own-history window as-of 2026-08-13",
"may_publish": false,
"replay": true,
"review_priority": "flagged",
"artefact_id": "2026-08-13-replay/compare-the-pair/jack-daniel-s-old-no-7-tennessee-whiskey-700ml-buffalo-trace-264648",
"format_note": "Compare the pair, automated light form. Two live tickets and each bottle's own-history position only; no CE 360 bands, no cross-read CEARP, no Welch t-test (the module does not produce them, pair_level null). This is not a divergence piece: the two engines broadly agree (VSM rank 18, CE rank 20, rank_diff -2). It qualifies on both bottles being at their own-history floor this week (quiet_discount). Both prices shelf basis, neither a member offer. Both 700mL.",
"claims": [
{
"item": "Jack Daniel's Old No.7 Tennessee Whiskey 700mL",
"kind": "price",
"value": 55
},
{
"item": "Buffalo Trace Bourbon 700mL",
"kind": "price",
"value": 58
}
],
"subjects": [
"Jack Daniel's Old No.7 Tennessee Whiskey 700mL",
"Buffalo Trace Bourbon 700mL"
],
"verified_at": "2026-09-27T05:30:42.000Z",
"verified_by": "etl/price_verify.py (harvest sidecar danmurphys_whisky_products_2026-08-13.normalised.csv, as of 2026-08-13)",
"verified_prices": {
"73587": 54.95,
"383121": 57.9
},
"verification_note": "2 price claim(s) verified live",
"quality_gate": "pass",
"gated_at": "2026-09-27T05:30:42.000Z",
"site_publish": true
}